This article was originally published on May 4, 2022. It was updated on June 24, 2022.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade today. Our School’s previous statement reaffirms our commitment to fight for reproductive justice:

Nearly 50 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed a person’s liberty to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. 

As of today 26 states are likely to pass legislation completely or partially banning abortions. 

Fundamentally abortion is an issue of reproductive justice, racial justice, health care access, class, and gender equity. As a profession, if we are committed to social justice, we must be willing to stop seeing abortion as the shadow “hot button” issue.

Even before this news, our Equity and Inclusion Committee was organizing to form a BUSSW learning community to collectively deepen our knowledge about reproductive justice more broadly, as well as abortion specifically. The SCOTUS opinion propelled us to develop this learning community sooner. In addition to reading books and articles about our past and present reproductive landscape, we will invite speakers and trainers from local reproductive health organizations and abortion fund agencies to support our learning. This work will help us act on the information we learn so we can contribute to reimagining how people access abortion care and other reproductive health-related services in the United States. 

In the coming weeks, members of the Equity & Inclusion Committee will hold space for our community to collectively discuss social workers’ role in this moment. In the meantime, there are three things members of our community can do:

1. Learn about abortion access in your state. If you live in Massachusetts, abortion will remain legal and accessible but we know our BUSSW community stretches across the country and the communities we live in and serve will be affected differently by this ruling.
2. Support abortion funds, practical support organizations, and independent people along with Planned Parenthood, so that reproductive justice organizations can continue to strengthen and sustain the power needed to navigate the rapidly shrinking landscape of abortion access. These are the groups that will ensure that all people, especially those living in states hostile to abortion, can access the care they need.
3. Tell five friends about abortion funds and share our Massachusetts Abortion Funds’ Resource Guide. This guide is not specific to Massachusetts, but rather contains information about donating to funds, how to talk about abortion, and how to access help.

Thanks and credit to doctoral candidate Greer Hamilton for her editorial leadership on this statement, and MSW student Kate Glynn for initiating the discussion to develop reproductive justice programming.

In solidarity,

Dean Jorge Delva
Equity & Inclusion Committee Chairs: Dawn Belkin Martinez & Ellen DeVoe

People migrating from South and Central America to the United States face a harrowing journey, braving some of the world’s most inhospitable environments by foot, often exposed to violence along the way. Those who make it to Mexico and the U.S. border are then faced with further trauma in camps and detention centers that are overburdened and under-resourced. Many of these migrants come to the United States seeking a better life for their families, often leaving family members as they make the costly trek north. Although less documented in the news, these family members suffer their own trauma from separation, often left behind in difficult circumstances. CISWH is providing essential trauma and mental health care services not only to migrants at the U.S. Mexico Border, but to family members waiting in Nicaragua as well.

The role CISWH plays

Family separation has been on the rise in Nicaragua, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic hit the Central American country hard, shuttering tobacco factories and other key industries leading to lay-offs for thousands of workers. Over 100,000 people have migrated from Nicaragua to neighboring Costa Rica and beyond since 2020. CISWH is working with the Superemos Foundation, a Nicaraguan non-profit providing community development through education, training, a comprehensive domestic violence program and related health and social work programs, to provide separated families with education and mental health support.

Professor Luz López, CISWH Global Health Core director; Ellie Zambrano, CISWH executive director; and Winnie Chen, administrative coordinator, were joined by two MSW students, Madelyn Fermin and Lauren Glaser, for a trip to Nicaragua in April 2022 where they participated in a cultural exchange and interprofessional partnership with the Superemos Foundation and the National Autonomous University of Nicaragua (UNAN-FAREM) in Estelí. Superemos Foundation collaborators included program co-founder Stephen Sefton, social worker, Sindy Alvarado, psychologist Karen Villareyna and lawyer, Maria Felix Castillo.

The CISWH and Superemos teams conducted interactive seminars on trauma care, violence prevention, and the psycho-social impact of migrant families’ separations for nurses, physicians, lawyers, and community health workers based in the communities of San Nicolas and surrounding rural areas. They also presented seminars for social work, psychology, and medical students at UNAM-FAREM. The Superemos Program works in collaboration with the Nicaragua Ministry of Health (MINSA) and the Ministry of Families. This cultural immersion experience serves to deepen BU social work students’ knowledge, clinical practice, and the cultural adaptations needed to work with migrants in both Central America and the United States.

“We as social workers have a key role in working with migrant families in their country of origin or at the Mexico/U.S.border. I feel so grateful to contribute as part of CISWH during this critical time,” Prof. López says.

Part of this work focuses heavily on care for women currently experiencing or surviving domestic abuse. Domestic violence is endemic in Nicaragua, and many women flee the country, with or without their children, to escape it. Working with Superemos, Prof. López and the CISWH team are training local nurses and physicians in preventive measures against domestic abuse. They’re also ensuring that practitioners have the tools they need to identify existing cases of abuse. These doctors and nurses can then connect women and their children with services from the Superemos Foundation and the Ministry of Family, offering protection and connecting women with family members who can keep them safe. This community-centered approach keeps women and their children together, while building strong preventive measures in rural areas in Nicaragua.

“We learn from the families as well – about their resilience. It was a two-way participatory process which was very, very helpful,” Prof. López says.

What’s next

As the federal Title 42 order is extended in the United States, families will remain separated and migrants will continue to be stalled in poor conditions at the U.S. and Mexico border. CISWH offers ongoing support to migrants and their families and continues to provide resources to ensure that nurses and doctors in rural areas can travel to Nicaragua’s capital, Estelí, to receive essential training. CISWH will also continue to train social work and psychology students in Nicaragua via Zoom. Prof. López plans to work with families directly, too, offering virtual consultations and social work support to families experiencing separation.

In the meantime, Prof. López highlights that there is much work to be done stateside as well. She wants to raise awareness about the families traveling to the border in hopes of improving their families’ circumstances. “People need to know these are hardworking families,” Prof. López says. “They don’t want to leave their kids behind. They very much care for their children and want to provide them with economic and educational opportunities.”

By definition, children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) require more health care services than children typically do to ensure their optimal health, quality of life and well-being.  About 20% of children in the US have special health care needs, and their care comprises about half of all pediatric health care spending. 

Health care spending in the US has historically been based on payment for acute, time-limited health care needs, and payment has not typically been attached to improved outcomes.  However, CYSHCN require a different approach, since their health care needs are ongoing and effective spending on improved health care in childhood pays dividends throughout the life course.

With health care costs spiraling for all populations, increasing attention is being paid to improving the cost-effectiveness of spending through payment reform. To date, the development and testing of payment reform has primarily focused on adults rather than children, who have different health and social needs.  This leaves gaps in knowledge around what kinds of benefits best serve CYSHCN, which payment models are the most cost-effective and how to identify and test new quality measures that ensure what’s being paid for matters to children, families, providers, and payers.

In a new paper from Academic Pediatrics co-authored by Meg Comeau, CISWH senior project director and principal investigator for the Catalyst Center, a team of experts recommend a financing research agenda focused on filling the knowledge gaps around benefits, payment models and quality measures in the care of CYSHCN.

The State of Research on Healthcare Financing for CYSHCN

To inform their research recommendations, the authors highlight three existing observations on current health care financing for CYSHCN, including:

• Underinsurance is a common problem for privately-insured families raising CYSHCN, and results in financial hardship for many.
• Almost half of all CYSHCN are enrolled in Medicaid coverage, along with most children with medically complex conditions.  Medicaid managed care may include capitation (a set amount of money per enrollee) and an emphasis on care coordination as a way of increasing value.
• Most of the existing research on increasing value in health care financing for CYSHCN focuses on models tested in specific environments (hospital-based outpatient clinics, for example) with limited numbers of participants, making it difficult to generalize findings to different settings and larger populations.

Recommendations for Future Research

Based on the current landscape of healthcare financing for CYSHCN, the authors identified three topic areas for research that addresses the specific needs of CYSHCN, their families, and their healthcare providers:

1. Assess value by evaluating the fit between benefit packages and the needs of CYSHCN through comparison of different payment models with typical patterns of need.
2. Develop models to measure return-on-investment for care coordination activities.
3. Use a multistakeholder process to identify and rank health care value outcomes for CYSHCN, as a precursor to developing and testing new quality measures.  Included in this process should be families raising CYSHCN, pediatric health care providers, and both public and private payers.

Using this agenda, researchers can begin to build a robust body of evidence that can lead to innovative financing that addresses the unique needs of CYSHCN and moves the focus from spending on health care to investment in children’s overall health and well-being.

Read the full article here.